Search for: "STATE v. SUEING"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 13,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 4:38 pm
Sussex v. [read post]
25 Dec 2008, 11:10 pm
The complaint (full text) in Godelman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
So plaintiffs are going to be looking around for other entities to sue. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Zherka v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
Zherka v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
EPA's recently finalized Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR, a.k.a. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:38 am
Id. at 295; see also United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:02 am
So if a State sues another State, the Court does have original jurisdiction; likewise if a State sues a citizen of another State (though in that situation, the Court may also have appellate jurisdiction, as my original post discussed, and as Cohens also held). [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
Justice Thomas’ dissent noted that the majority’s decision was a pyrrhic victory for the defendant because the plaintiff could turn around and sue in state court, where Article III standing limits do not apply. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:29 am
In a recent decision, Oxford University Bank v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 am
(Cassirer v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 am
(Cassirer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:18 pm
There's much to be said about standing in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:26 am
First of the day, Thacker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
In 2012, the Court ruled in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 11:57 am
The United States Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
Constitution left it notoriously ambiguous whether individuals could sue sovereign states for breach of contract in federal court. [read post]
