Search for: "Sellers v. United States"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
United States 16-309 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
More generally, in the Verizon v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 10:12 am
From Judge Barbara Rothstein's opinion yesterday in Kennedy v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:42 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
In today’s world, physical presence was not a meaningful surrogate for the economic presence sufficient to make a seller the subject of state taxation. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:54 am
SEC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
” Ninth Circuit (California): On December 15, the 9th Circuit took oral argument in its en banc (full court) review of the controversial United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
United States Forbes had a piece “Judge Tosses Out Another GOP Lawsuit Against CNN”. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:00 am
Although the Supreme Court has not always honored the sentiment, it was after all a free speech case--United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Meese v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
The June 11 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
This brings the policy into line with the United States, UK, Canada and Ireland. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:05 am
Plaintiffs were consumers of Cheerios who resided in California, New Jersey, and New York, seeking to sue on behalf of all similarly situated individuals in the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:10 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 816 (2009) supported its decision. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 12:56 pm
” The court reasoned that the overseas cash “represent[s] opportunity for the Company either in terms of investment or in repatriating those funds for use in the United States, which would likely trigger a taxable event. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
