Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:59 pm by Greg Mersol
Less than two years ago, the United States Supreme Court overruled 32 years of Sixth Circuit authority that had the practical effect of shackling unionized employers to retiree health insurance benefits far beyond the time they had intended. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977, by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Carlin himself wasn’t involved directly in the case, which was called Federal Communications Commission V. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 11:24 am
The issue to be decided in the present case is whether the substantial-federal-question doctrine provides federal subject-matter jurisdiction over a state law claim on the basis that an embedded element of the claim concerns 26 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The order also indicates that the oral argument in Lucia v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 2:38 pm by Erin McCarthy Holliday
Six of the Board’s seven voting members are selected from a list by Congress, and the seventh is selected by the President of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
If Breyer is writing in this case, it would bring him to seven opinions for the term. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, the Department of Justice asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to refrain from taking any further action in the leading case challenging President Trump’s already infamous Executive Order (EO) 13769, which temporarily banned entry into the country by nationals of seven predominantly Muslim countries and all refugees, while indefinitely banning entry of Syrian refugees. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:13 pm by Victoria VanBuren
He suggested that I explore the topic of "manifest disregard" of the law in light of the United States Supreme Court decision Hall Street Associates, LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]