Search for: "Shell v. State" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 7:27 am by Phil Dixon
Coffey worked for former Granville County Sheriff Brindell Wilkins, who was also charged with felony offenses and whose convictions were also set aside in State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
The UK Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20 and Okpabi v Shell [2021] UKSC 3 have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in English courts. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Royal Dutch Shell plc in May 2021, the Dutch court ordered Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its emissions by 45% by 2030 in response to an action filed by 17,000 Dutch citizens who said Shell’s investment in fossil fuels would threaten their human rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
They did so for no consideration either to plaintiff or the Company, rendering the Company an empty shell. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]