Search for: "Sound Design Technologies Limited"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Although I’ve historically had a laptop ban in my classes, I’ve worked with NU’s Emerging Technologies Librarian, Kara Young, to design projects and teaching methods that require students to open up their laptops and even go online. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
” I was aware that California protects sound recordings through 2047, but I was not aware of any other states that had temporal protection limits. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
” I was aware that California protects sound recordings through 2047, but I was not aware of any other states that had temporal protection limits. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
” I was aware that California protects sound recordings through 2047, but I was not aware of any other states that had temporal protection limits. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm
" I was aware that California protects sound recordings through 2047, but I was not aware of any other states that had temporal protection limits. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:03 pm
Komesaroff noted that due to limited experience and small financial reserves, overseas investment approvals were essentially subjective, personal and informal processes. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm
Bye, bye 150-mile limit. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:40 am
At EFF, we support sound copyright policy like the Unlocking Technology Act, and you should, too. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:08 pm
Also designed to give the consumer a way to do time-shifting of TV program viewing, one version of the new technology was the “Remote-Storage DVR,” developed in the cable TV industry. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 6:51 am
As Professor Samuelson’s work shows, one need not be an expert on every nuance of the patent system, especially the nitty-gritty of prosecution, to make sound reform proposals. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In recent decades, due to technology, copyright law has increasingly had to deal with a similar question. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
Was 1202 just another bad congressional prediction about what technology would enable and/or require? [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Owners have concluded that attention to readers would limit their rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
(E.g., no derivative work right for perfumes, as the rules differ for sound recordings/architectural works.) [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:54 am
IP rights are designed to artificially replicate scarcity where it would not otherwise exist. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:51 pm
(Many Musical Works copyright holders have designated the Harry Fox Agency as their agent for such licensing – so would-be users of Musical Works generally need only contact the Fox Agency.) [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
I note just how many people in this conversation assumed that the technology behind Content ID could magically and easily be rolled out (costlessly?) [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
It would then be easier for other companies and inventors in the same technology space to design around the amended claims. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
It has to have limits. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm
Areas of disagreement The core of disagreements, of which there were a healthy and robust amount, seemed to come down to how to deal with a technology that on the one hand has significant risks, but also might have some limited lawful and even valuable uses. [read post]
