Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 13,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2023, 4:29 am
Google's counterproposal is October 23, arguing that the plaintiffs' proposal "will likely conflict with the trial in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
As per Microsoft's request, Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had set an expedited briefing schedule and a motion hearing for tomorrow (January 19, 10 AM Pacific Time) with respect to Microsoft's motion to stay the case pending regulatory proceedings concerning the same transaction. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
CastleAdmitted in California and Texas January 5, 2023 By Regulations.gov Suzanne WilsonGeneral Counsel and Associate Register of CopyrightsU.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:13 pm
United States, involving the same issue, but ultimately decided that case on a different ground. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
They have one child together, M.D., who was born in June 2008 in California and is a United States citizen. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
Judge Corley has just granted the latter:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 9:08 am
Hopkins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
Thirty years ago, the United States joined the U.N. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
Earlier this week, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against one of the country's leading law firms - Covington & Burling LLP. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm
Anne Arundel County 2022). [2] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
United States, she seeks to revisit that conclusion, arguing that because the provisions are avowedly deterrent and non-compensatory, they are subject to the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
While FTC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
(Dabney v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Lafayette v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Norman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
California (1973) (obscenity) United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:35 am
The November argument was in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
Illinois Brick could have been overruled in Apple v. [read post]
