Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2008, 11:15 am
Since then, appeals courts in New Jersey, Missouri, and Illinois all have rejected public nuisance claims against former lead pigment manufacturers. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Plaintiffs claimed violations of the "Public Use Clause" of the Fifth Amendment and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, along with a New York State law claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Plaintiffs claimed violations of the "Public Use Clause" of the Fifth Amendment and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, along with a New York State law claim. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by admin
Last month, a federal district judge sitting in Colorado ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:54 am
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Thompson is similar to the New Jersey Supreme Court's 1995 ruling in Craig v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:37 am by Bonny Rafel
On November 27, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in the matter of U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 10:29 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman represents individuals with criminal charges in the New Jersey Superior Court in all counties, all New Jersey municipal courts, and in all three New Jersey vicinages of the the United States District Court. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:54 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
A recent age discrimination case from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is a helpful reminder that just because your employer has a good excuse for its decision to fire you, it does not necessarily mean the company did not violate the law. [read post]
21 May 2015, 11:41 am
”  Such was the conclusion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Hefferan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
An employee of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey filed the complaint under the pseudonym "Female Port Authority Officer 47708" v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.In this appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit the court initially noted the case was captioned: “Female Port Authority Officer 47708,” until now notwithstanding the fact that the employee did not… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:20 am by Sheppard Mullin
  On January 5, 2011, the Third Circuit issued its decision in New Jersey Retail Merchants Association v. [read post]