Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2008, 1:08 pm
As observed by the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:08 am
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s momentous decision in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Jeff Welty’s pithy explanation of the potential impact in North Carolina of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:41 pm
Because in Fussman the plaintiffs chose a case under North Carolina law. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:18 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court addressed in Turner v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – January 23rd, 2018) involves an car accident. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:02 pm
Ilya Shapiro (of the Cato Institute) has an interesting post discussing the upcoming Supreme Court argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 6:19 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
United States, No. 08-1301. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
University of North Carolina, which are poised to determine the role of affirmative action in college admissions. [read post]
2 May 2022, 3:00 am
” This rule was applied in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
This prompted the prosecutor to check with the United States Attorney’s office. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 12:40 pm
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
See State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 2:12 pm
United States State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:52 pm
In a contrary ruling, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (embracing federal courts located in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina) held that the DOL’s waiver regulations prohibited all FMLA settlements without supervision from the DOL or without court approval. [read post]
