Search for: "State v. Baker" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,915
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court upheld funding and facilities restrictions on women's access to abortion and abortion counseling.The brief also vehemently insists that the federal district court is bound by the "precedent" of Baker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court upheld funding and facilities restrictions on women's access to abortion and abortion counseling.The brief also vehemently insists that the federal district court is bound by the "precedent" of Baker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The Supreme Court of Canada, as stated out in Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Effron-Baker split in decisions dealing with untimely filings many times since United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am by Russ Bensing
  Nine years later, in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Gregory Forman
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court issued Baker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Stanton v Board of Trustees, 157 AD2d 712, the court commented that Stanton failed to demonstrate that the appointing authority "made no independent appraisal and reached no independent conclusion”, quoting Matter of Kilgus v Board of Estimate of City of N.Y., 308 NY 620.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_08385.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Stanton v Board of Trustees, 157 AD2d 712, the court commented that Stanton failed to demonstrate that the appointing authority "made no independent appraisal and reached no independent conclusion”, quoting Matter of Kilgus v Board of Estimate of City of N.Y., 308 NY 620.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_08385.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Constitution by depriving same-sex couples of the fundamental right to marry, including recognition of their lawful, out-of-state marriages; (2) whether a state impermissibly infringes upon same-sex couples’ fundamental right to interstate travel by refusing to recognize their lawful out-of-state marriages; and (3) whether this Court’s summary dismissal in Baker v. [read post]