Search for: "State v. Branch" Results 1021 - 1040 of 6,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2010, 11:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In making this argument, the SG notes that the decision to recognize Massachusetts’ standing in Mass v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
54 A.D.3d 883 864 N.Y.S.2d 111 2008 NY Slip Op 7024 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:17 pm
  Without proof of such allegations, I would think any prosecution for fraud in this country would violate the First Amendment under an old case, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:45 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court's order earlier today refusing to stay a federal district court order in Strange v. [read post]
A US federal judge ruled on Monday that President Donald Trump had “no constitutional authority” to fire staff and terminate programmatic activities at the US Institute of Peace (USIP) (United States Inst. of Peace v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:45 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Keith Eric Wood The State of Michigan Court of Appeals issued an opinion in People v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"A motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) will fail if, taking all facts alleged as true and according them every possible inference favorable to the plaintiff, the complaint states in some recognizable form any cause of action known to our law" (Kennedy v H. [read post]