Search for: "State v. Browne" Results 1021 - 1040 of 8,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:05 am
Disciplinary suspension without pay results in the voiding of the educator's required visaMatter of Brown v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 31687(U), July 22, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 102678/09, Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Thus, this article argues that Sweatt set the stage for Brown v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Jerry Brown signs athlete workers’ comp bill” [L.A. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Mayer, which held that private acts of race discrimination in housing were prohibited by the Civil Rights Act; and United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Mayer, which held that private acts of race discrimination in housing were prohibited by the Civil Rights Act; and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am by Daniel Jin
The post Absent Defendants and Section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (<i>R v Umerji</i> [2021] Case Commentary) appeared first on Brown Rudnick. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]