Search for: "State v. Constant"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,972
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
In September, the First District Court of Appeal issued an opinion in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:41 pm
Twitter brings news of this interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The Forensics of Verbal Fillers Broadly stated, speakers tend to use the verbal fillers uh and um when something has interrupted the enormously complicated task of speech production. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:47 am
R (Haney & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice (10 December 2014) Indeterminate sentences and the inadequate funding of rehabilitation during them has posed problems since Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences hamstrung the system. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:44 am
The basis for this was most recently stated in Owenby v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:03 am
Related Issues: InternationalWIPORelated Cases: WNET v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:18 am
His record also included statements by coworkers regarding his constant complaints and negative remarks about his managers and the City. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 3:44 pm
The rules of pro hac vice vary from state to state, but one thing is constant. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 10:51 am
First, we consider whether a doctor’s finding that Curley did not pose a safety threat belies one of the City’s stated reasons for firing him—his long history of threatening coworkers. . . .Curley received many oral and written reprimands during his employment with the City. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Case C-484/14 McFadden is a reference for a preliminary ruling from CJEU-loving Member State Germany, seeking clarification as regards the liability of a freely-accessible wi-fi provider for third-party copyright infringements committed via that wireless network. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm
In McDonald v McDonald (our note here), the Court of Appeal noted that there was no constant or clear line of ECtHR cases demonstrating that Art.8 applied to the private sector. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
Jump to: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W A Back to top Acute care – A high level of care provided to a patient for a medical condition or illness that a patient is likely to recover from. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:34 am
Over 100 years ago, in Lord v Hull, 178 NY 9 [1904], the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — drew upon English common law to establish what has become a bedrock principle of American partnership law, that courts generally will not entertain lawsuits between partners except in the setting of a dissolution or final accounting. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
The Florida case is Eghnayem v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
Besides being dishonest, this status engenders a constant menace of federal arrest and prosecution for patients and caregivers, even for those living in states where distribution and use is legal and regulated at the state level. [read post]
