Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Rogers, a lecturer in the Department of History at Central Connecticut State University, has published Workers against the City: The Fight for Free Speech in Hague v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm by Jason Kelley
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
But fundamentally, Louisiana can only tax income that has a connection with the state and, in fairness, a taxpayer must be given the opportunity on audit to demonstrate that the dominant purpose of a particular borrowing was to produce apportionable income. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Investigative website Open Democracy uncovered details of the Cabinet Office during  months of research for a report on the state of Freedom of Information. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:00 am by Léon Dijkman
Vanni cites the Indian Supreme Court's decision in Novartis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
The final score shows utter domination. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Similarly, the Republican Secretary of State in Georgia has thus far stood up to the bizarre call for him to step down from that state’s two Republican senators, but he might yet do so. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
" One of these is the dominance of lawmaking by executive Fiat rather than legislation. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]