Search for: "State v. Eager"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
First, the administration contends that the United States is in a state of armed conflict with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm
” Like the Viacom v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
This, it is argued, may ultimately undermine the rule of law and the safeguarding of constitutional rights against the political organs of the State. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
(That case, United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:04 am
At the time, the parties stated their belief that the receiver had “about” $7.9 million in his account. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:41 pm
Further, the breathtaking eagerness with which the judiciary has over the past decade upheld draconian laws like the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (in 1994), [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
To be sure, the Court very likely will decide this case, Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:56 am
One needn't expect more, I suppose, but it's not exactly high-order journalism -- more a skillful use of the ctrl-V function. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
Companies have never been eager to have their security slip-ups revealed to consumers. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:22 pm
Without arbitration, he wrote in the 1995 decision, Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
In drug cases, though, Congress and the courts change all the rules: in most states you can’t even argue the drug maker was negligent, you can only argue the drug maker didn’t warn you that they were negligent. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Though the Court punted in Frank v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:44 am
Saunders v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am
–RH By Lorraine Minnite Propaganda is playing a crucial role in the fast-moving campaign to enact more onerous voter identification (ID) laws in the states. [read post]
