Search for: "State v. Gross" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm by Robert Liles
This effectively opened the door for patients to readily participate in genetic testing without the fear of losing their insurance due to the presence of a preexisting illness or disease.[5] V. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
” In a nutshell, authorities in a multitude of states had shut down and/or placed the nursing facilities in receivership as a result of gross mismanagement by the time the limited partners sued for dissolution. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am by Giles Peaker
There are certain exceptions, including at s.113(3)(a), which states that subsection (1) does not prevent “a claim for judicial review”. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Caleb Skeath and B.J. Altvater
  However, even if a business makes individual notifications pursuant to one of these laws or regulations, the business will still be required to notify the New York Attorney General, the New York Secretary of State, the Division of State Police, and, if more than 5,000 New York residents are notified, consumer reporting agencies. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Of states reporting personal property tax data, state reliance on personal property in 2017 ranged from 1.79 percent to about 29 percent of state property tax bases. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 8:47 am by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Hockley & Anor (2019) EWCA Civ 1080 If you can only actually fit one child into a bedroom and you have two children, how many bedrooms should you be allowed under the bedroom tax regulations (Regulation B13)? [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm by Buckingham
Under the economic presence standard, an out-of-state seller is presumed to have substantial nexus with Ohio if the seller has Ohio gross receipts greater than $100,000 or at least 200 transactions delivered to Ohio. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am by Edmund LaCour
Gross, the court set forth a two-step test for inmates challenging their method of execution as cruel and unusual. [read post]