Search for: "State v. Harm" Results 1021 - 1040 of 26,003
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The court doesn’t insist that the board members should have stated they were not independent. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm by Unknown
Johnson (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Unknown
The 2023 Proxy Statement stated that Apple intended to award the NEOs $77.5 million in performance-based compensation in each of 2021 and 2022. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:51 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
  The SOE received a fence that materially met the tender specifications and the public purse was not harmed. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While many states look to Delaware as an authority on issues of corporate law, companies that are incorporated in other states should consult with local counsel to ensure that any relevant differences are taken into consideration. [2] See, e.g., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
”  A press release accompanying the bill’s introduction stated that Congressman Pallone introduced the bill “to protect consumers from the bombardment of dangerous and unwanted calls and texts that have been exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 11:44 am by Tobin Admin
Hiring and Retention The judge wrote that an employer has a duty to exercise ordinary care not to hire or retain an employee the employer knew or should have known posed a risk of harm to others where it is reasonably foreseeable from the employee’s tendencies or propensities that the employee could cause the type of harm sustained by the plaintiff. [read post]