Search for: "State v. Hernandez" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Colombia’s presidential election now heads to a June runoff between Hernandez and Gustavo Petro, a former rebel-turned senator making a bid to be the nation’s first leftist president. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Areli Escobar was convicted in Texas state court of the sexual assault and murder of Biana Maldonado Hernandez and sentenced to death. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:28 pm by Anthony Zaller
Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44, 49 (2003) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via Pinal Central), Howard Fischer reports that a ruling in Hernandez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]