Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Stack’s assumed no liability for the facts stated concerning the items in the auction, except as specified in the terms of sale (Terms of Sale ¶¶ 15, 18 [k]; see Terms of Sale ¶ 31 [“Stack’s hereby disclaims all liability for damages, incidental, consequential or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with the sale of any property by Stack’s to purchaser”]). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:36 am
The case is Fowler v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 8:49 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:49 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:00 pm
[i] United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am
Fairly simply, the complaint stated that the manager observed the defendant place clothes under his shirt and walk out of the store without paying for the items. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am
Fairly simply, the complaint stated that the manager observed the defendant place clothes under his shirt and walk out of the store without paying for the items. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
See also State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:56 pm
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs, rejected the invitation to "engage in a searching review of the government's implementation of CPIA import restrictions on Chinese and Cypriot cultural property. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
No work of any kind may cross an exact vertical projection of this property line, above or below ground as noted in Anderson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:42 pm
See State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am
It was not until [Deprospero] requested the return of his property that the ADA spoke to the State Police and realized that not all the property had been tested by that time. [read post]
6 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Preventing the sale of a unique item. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 8:40 am
Bonds and Pendleton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 10:09 am
But especially CLS Bank v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:01 am
More specifically, whether the taxpayer intended or expected that the property sold was or would be a capital item in the hands of the purchaser under Schedule 10 of the VAT Act 1994, resulting in the taxpayer’s option to tax being disapplied. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Different states have different practices, but in Texas (and 10 other states) DNA swabs are taken upon arrest and entered into the system. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:16 pm
California (joined with United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
But see National Football League Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
