Search for: "State v. Kelly " Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Moderator: Kelly Maser, United States Olympic Committee (United States) Ambush marketing: capitalizing on the excitement surrounding an event. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - ;bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
In the case of Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
In the case of Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:04 am by INFORRM
 The plaintiff’s damages were awarded at Aus$100,000 plus interest, although the judge did not specifically identify any amount for aggravated damages. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:43 am
The United States later initiated this criminal prosecution. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am by Susan Brenner
State, 286 Ga. 535, 690 S.E.2d 136 (2010).Twiggs v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Julie Lam
Supreme Court decisions based on the definition of acquittal set forth in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Kelly Gindele
  This peculiar outcome became clear in Laurel Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
 ;  There is a news story about the case on the website of the claimant’s solicitors. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 ;In Parise v Detroit Entertainment, LLC, the Court concluded there was no ground to disqualify either Chief Justice Young or Justice Kelly. [read post]