Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 19,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
On appeal, however, it was found that the mark had become distinctive, within the meaning of Article 7(3), in the German and English-speaking member states. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:34 am
February 23, 2023 - 4:10 PM (Live at Arizona State University): El Burro, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
Cai v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Mark Baptist Church of Pittsburg v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 4:20 am
This development marks a significant step in addressing systemic inequalities in the Indian criminal justice system. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:51 pm
AP is reporting that the State of Utah has made its mark in the States v Feds immigration controversy by passing a law similar to the Arizona Immigration Law with one huge exception. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:24 am
Co. v Stein, 1 NY3d 416, 421 [2004] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:01 pm
Knights Armament Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The case is David Couture v Playdom (Fed. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 10:10 am
Vantage Trailers, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
” Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm
This morning the court issued an opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Sometimes elegance is refusal.The average consumer and the nature of the purchasing actAs per Sabel BV v Puma AG, the average consumer normally perceives a trade mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse the various details. [read post]
Case Preview: Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (Case ID: 2021/0201).
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
In this post, Rachel Free (Partner), Toby Sears (Partner) and Omri Shirion (Associate) of the CMS Intellectual Property team, preview the UK Supreme Court’s upcoming hearing of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 2:32 pm
Dep’t of Parks & Recreation for State of Cal. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
He noted that, because of his conclusion on reasonable expectation of privacy, this strictly speaking did not arise but nevertheless went on to state his finding. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
Bristow v. [read post]
