Search for: "State v. Pass "
Results 1021 - 1040
of 25,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 2:42 pm
State (2015) and Jamison v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:17 am
It also passed no comment on the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which clearly formed the view that this was not a matter where EU law was ambiguous. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:30 am
Eight months later, in early 2012, in the long awaited decision in Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 3:45 pm
State of Oklahoma, (OK Sup. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:29 pm
On June 13, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Puerto Rico v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Christopher et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:33 pm
Doe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 10:21 am
Statutes passed the state legislature in 2015 approve this practice. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
In Faasse v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court decision, McCarty v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:47 am
Kingdomware Technologies v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:40 am
And now that Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm
As KJK has previously covered, earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered a landmark ruling on the reach of the protections afforded by the Clean Water Act (CWA) in Sacket v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:27 pm
The state court of appeals affirmed his conviction in July 2006, and the time to appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest appellate court for criminal cases, passed on August 11, 2006. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:42 am
In 2018, Maryland passed the “Online Electioneering Transparency and Accountability Act”. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 11:46 am
Part II considers state and federal legislative and administrative responses to Bush v. [read post]