Search for: "State v. Race" Results 1021 - 1040 of 8,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
As the Court heard the case of Schuette v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm by Peter Moulinos
In the recent case of Argyle Realty Associates v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 6:19 pm
As a result, the other Maryland racetracks withdrew their consent to Cloverleaf receiving the simulcast signals of their own races and out-of-state races. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am by Amy Howe
Norfolk Southern Railway (Nov. 8): Whether the Constitution’s due process clause bars a state from requiring a corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction as a condition of doing business in the state. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Up to this point, the Supreme Court has prohibited attorneys from exercising peremptory challenges to remove jurors because of their race (Batson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am by John Elwood
This case involves a convicted murderer’s challenge to the prosecution’s allegedly race-based use of peremptory strikes under Batson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:36 pm by Joshua Matz
The petition of the day is: Corboy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:45 pm by Rick Hasen
  But Judge Reinhardt issued a nine-page concurring opinion, which begins with the point that the state of Nevada is likely to succeed on the merits: “I wish to make clear that the panel is in agreement that the basis for our grant of the stay of the district court’s order pursuant to Winter v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:24 am by John Richards
Furthermore, because abortion is a constitutional right (with significant limitations) under Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:15 am by Immigration Prof
Here is critical commentary on Justice Scalia's opinion for a unanimous Supreme Court in Whren v.... [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]