Search for: "State v. Simon" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 5:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Schiedegger responds to Akil Amar’s recent commentary on the exclusionary rule in this blog’s symposium on the Court after Scalia, contending that last Term’s decision in Utah v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:28 pm
EvidenceProf Blog has a post about the use of Static-99 in a case before the 7th Circuit (link corrected thanks to Jim in the comments):The Seventh Circuit was recently presented with STATIC-99 evidence in the case, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
Next week in the courts The trial in Hunt v Times Newspapers will continue before Simon J on 7 May 2013. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am by NL
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am by NL
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
 A panel consisting of Prof Graeme Dinwoodie (Oxford University), Simon Malynicz QC (3 New Square) and David Stone (Simmons & Simmons) promises to "deep dive into the real meat of the reforms" [Mmm...trade mark meat... [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “New York State imposes a $1.5 million penalty in cybersecurity breach case”. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm by Giles Peaker
Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Simon LazarusYesterday on Balkinization I introduced this two-part essay, and discussed how a likely resolution of the pending Supreme Court case, Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am by Tobias Thienel
Hackney London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 789, 796 [CA, per Simon Brown LJ]) or as something else; indeed, the Supreme Court of Ireland, in A (A), supra, at p. 315, describes the discussion on this as merely a matter of ‘taxonomy’. [read post]