Search for: "State v. So " Results 1021 - 1040 of 117,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 9:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
  So Young and the Eleventh Amendment aren't going to kill such a suit.Justice Kennedy, concurring joined by Justice Thomas, tells us that state law, not federal law, is the way to stop the absurdity of the state suing itself:First, and most important, state law must authorize an agency or official to sue another arm of the State. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:03 pm
In my mind, to state the question presented by this case is pretty much to answer it. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:08 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
United States, 14-5703 applied the test set out in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:04 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Available for download at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2586491 “When the Supreme Court struck down the so-called contraceptive mandate in Burwell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:25 am
So asks the Patent Baristas blog in discussing the sovereign-immunity issues of Biomedical Patent Management v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The section also mandates that such a respondent must be so confined pending the completion of a sex offender civil management trial. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:27 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress testimony — Expert testimony Accused of firing shots at police officers using a gun that he kept in his home, and then setting fire to his residence, after the officers requested that he exit his house so that they could serve him with a writ of eviction, appellant, David ... [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
Housing authority need not state the obvious that the offer is  final Omar v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:36 am
Show me the money.Okay, so that was fairly obvious. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:08 am by R.J. MacReady
The State charged Gonzales with two counts of aggravated sexual assault against his eight-year-old daughter. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In 1874, the Supreme Court held in Murdock v City of Memphis that it lacked “jurisdiction” to review a state supreme court’s interpretation of state law, even in cases that present federal-law claims. [read post]