Search for: "State v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 258,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 1:51 am
R (Aguilar Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Advice on Individual Rights in Europe and another intervening); R (Bibi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1482; [2010] WLR (D) 341 “R 277 of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules, which prevented entry clearance to a party to a marriage where one spouse was a United Kingdom citizen and either party was aged under 21 years, was a disproportionate inhibition on… [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am
Virginia, McCoy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:56 am
The complaint contained less than 40 words and alleged that the State had “maliciously [prosecuted] [Arfaa], ignoring exculpatory evidence, resulting […] The post BABAK ERNEST ARFAA v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
STATE V. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:40 pm
Under State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
Clay v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:00 pm
In Alden v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 3:56 am
State of Florida SC07-1603 Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:38 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletin - find case summaries and links to source documents at: http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/currentcta.htmWolfchild v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
The post Does State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
The post Does State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:36 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:55 am
United States with a variety of other decisions, including Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:13 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0342, 2012 MT 22, MONTANA STATE FUND, Petitioner and Appellee, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:19 am
Lyle Denniston has a preview on SCOTUSblog of the argument next week in United States v. [read post]
