Search for: "State v. Ward" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm by Law Lady
Moreover, the absent lot owners' interests were sufficiently aligned with those of the existing parties that the existing parties could represent them, and there was no risk of inconsistent judgments.Connecticut State Dental Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:30 pm by Rosenbaum & Associates
., who is 36 and also suffers from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, ended up in a locked psychiatric ward because she had nowhere else to go. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of… [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
The defendant ultimately pled to second-degree murder in state court for the death. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
 None of the accusations are true, he states. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:15 pm by Jack Pringle
Using “Part I, Section A, Subsection 1” to organize a brief may work in a paper document when the judge can discern that an “A” probably corresponds to “Part I” rather than “Part V. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:15 pm by Jack Pringle
Using “Part I, Section A, Subsection 1” to organize a brief may work in a paper document when the judge can discern that an “A” probably corresponds to “Part I” rather than “Part V. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am by Giorgio Luceri
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]