Search for: "State v. Welcome" Results 1021 - 1040 of 6,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Welcome back to yet another season of Relist Watch, which is kind of like Baywatch except that, instead of being a source of ironic enjoyment, this column is a source of no enjoyment. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by Gene Quinn
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Welcome back to the UK Human Rights Roundup, your weekly bulletin of human rights news. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 10:53 pm
See In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706 ("reversion" to the defendant of part of a potential settlement fund can be approved as part of an equitable cy pres remedy). [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
Happy Teenth–and welcome to the last Commercial Roundup of spring 2024! [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
However, decisions in bankruptcy cases over the last few years brought into question whether a trust established by a resident of a non-DAPT state in a jurisdiction authorizing such trusts is governed by the law of the DAPT state or the law of the settlor’s state of residence. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
However, decisions in bankruptcy cases over the last few years brought into question whether a trust established by a resident of a non-DAPT state in a jurisdiction authorizing such trusts is governed by the law of the DAPT state or the law of the settlor’s state of residence. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm by Rosalind English
Secretary of State for Home Department (Respondent) v AP (Appellant) (no 2) [2009] EWCA Civ 731 Supreme Court 23 June 2010 AP, who had been subject to a control order and who now continued to live at the same address under bail pending a deportation decision on grounds of national security, was entitled to continuing anonymity because of the risks he faced if his identity were revealed - read judgment We posted recently on a ruling by the Supreme Court that the social isolation… [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:20 am by Kenneth B. Weckstein
Some laws are just too confusing to be broken, or so sayeth the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]