Search for: "Trump v. Biden" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
*           *           *The Trump Administration, not unsurprisingly, was actively engaged in undercutting democracy in Bolivia. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm by David Kopel
Cargill; the case challenges the administrative prohibition on bump stocks imposed by the Trump and Biden administrations, via interpretation by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE). [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 11:43 pm by Richard Frank
  (The incoming Trump administration will doubtless move to revoke the waiver authority approved by the outgoing Biden administration, but that will take time.) [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
” The Supreme Court has ruled that the Biden administration could cancel the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” program, which required authorities either to jail asylum applicants from Central America or deny them U.S. entry until their cases are resolved. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am by Dennis Boyle
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am by Dennis Boyle
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
A prior case seeking to prevent the termination of the “Stay in Mexico” policy resulted in a win for the Biden administration in Biden v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am by SHG
While some, if not many, would argue that the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 7:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As occurred when progressive groups and blue states challenged Trump Administration EOs, the district court in Missouri v Biden concluded that the plaintiff states needed to challenge a specific final regulatory action that harms then, and could not challenge the presidential directive itself. [read post]