Search for: "Trump v. New York" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am by Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held yesterday that the Trump administration can strip legal status from 400,000 immigrant workers, writes The New York Times. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump Had More Than 300 Classified Documents at Mar-a-Lago Yahoo News – Maggie Haberman, Jodi Kantor, Adam Goldman, and Ben Protess (New York Times) | Published: 8/22/2022 The initial batch of documents retrieved by the National Archives from former President Trump in January included more than 150 marked as classified, a number that ignited concern at the Justice Department and helped trigger the investigation that led FBI agents to search… [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm by CAFE
 REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet, Webby AwardsUnited States v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 6:19 pm by Samuel Bray
That idea is at its zenith (or nadir) in the complaint filed by Texas, which argues that there is no inconsistency between its challenge to the 2012 DACA order and the challenges in California and New York, because those are to later actions by the Trump administration and not to the 2012 order. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak surveys Trump’s list, concluding that it “manages both to reassure the conservative legal establishment and to represent a rebellion against it. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
& POL. 350 (forthcoming 2024)  Laura Gamio and Mitch Smith, Tracking Efforts to Remove Trump From the 2024 Ballot, New York Times (Jan. 2, 2024) Keegan Hamilton, Trump Challenges Move To Keep Him Off The 2024 Ballot In Oregon Supreme Court, Constitutional Accountability Center (Dec. 30, 2023)  Steven Portnoy, What the framers said about the 14th Amendment's disqualification clause: Analysis, ABC News (Dec. 29, 2023)  Kurt Lash,… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:53 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Cars Seized by Police Get Supreme Court Scrutiny in Civil Forfeiture Case (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) The Supreme Court takes up social media cases similar to one about Donald Trump’s Twitter feed (Mark Sherman, The Associated Press) Democrats plan to subpoena wealthy benefactors of Supreme Court justices (Ann E. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Guardian reports that Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Disney CEO Robert Iger are withdrawing from the president’s business advisory panel, while the New York Times reports that former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is organizing a group of businesses, universities, and politicians that will voluntarily uphold the terms of the accord. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on the latest public comments of the Supreme Court’s “most outspoken member,” noting that “[i]n a pair of recent appearances, Justice [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg critiqued the Trump Administration’s travel ban, previewed the coming court term, predicted an end to capital punishment and suggested that other branches of government are in disarray. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in the New York Post on the next step in the effort to disqualify former president Donald Trump in the 2024 election. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:47 am by Anushka Limaye
In addition to packages sent to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, the CNN offices in New York, billionaire George Soros, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and Maxine Walters, two additional devices addressed to Joe Biden and Robert De Niro were found Thursday morning, reports the New York Times. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Reasonable readers must be taught that that the First Amendment allows us the “breathing space” to make such errors (See, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:14 am by Lawrence Solum
In Shady Grove, however, the risk of horizontal forum shopping was small, because there was little chance that a court outside of New York would have applied the New York state statute. [read post]