Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 1021 - 1040 of 7,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
The Court ruled that if Rule 23’s specific terms are met on who may file a class-action lawsuit, the case may proceed in federal court. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:03 pm
(U.S.S.C., May 21, 2018, Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A judge's vote in an unannounced opinion held not to survive his or her deathRizo v Yovino, 586 U. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A judge's vote in an unannounced opinion held not to survive his or her deathRizo v Yovino, 586 U. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Miho Suzuki v Greenberg 2023 NY Slip Op 31289(U) April 21, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159360/2021 Judge: David B. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 5:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  That’s exactly what happened in Johnson v Braverman CPA PC  2020 NY Slip Op 33149(U) September 25, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650894/2020 Judge: Arlene P. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
By email dated May 9, 2013, Harris sent copies of the deed to the property, the first and final pages of the trust agreement, and an appraisal of the property’s fair market value to Steven Frushtick, ARG’s accountant at defendant Wiener Frushtick & Straub (WPS), stating that “only 50% of the house” had been transferred to the trust. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Attorneys may select among reasonable courses of action in prosecuting their clients’ cases without thereby committing malpractice … so that a purported malpractice claim that amounts only to a client’s criticism of counsel’s strategy may be dismissed” (Dweck Law Firm, LLP v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001 ]). [read post]