Search for: "US v. Garcia"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 7:27 am
Garcia v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Serna-Garcia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:59 pm
Meshwerks v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:08 pm
In Arrellano v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
If anyone has any intel, please let us know. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm
Motorola v BlackBerry: Last Friday Motorola filed a complaint with the US International Trade Commission (ITC) requesting an investigation into alleged infringing use of several of Motorola’s patents by RIM, the maker of BlackBerry. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:32 am
Garcia, No. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 908 P.2d 1095, 1104 (Colo. 1995); Garcia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
Using this framework, the PTO uses either the greater of the A delay or B delay to determine the appropriate adjustment but never combines the two. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:01 am
Using a drug dog within a couple of minutes of the stop was not unreasonable. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:03 am
Hector Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. 2009 WL 4841064(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:37 pm
The federal law also says "knowingly" whereas the state law doesn't use that same word. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:06 pm
(See Covenant Care, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
Garcia, 474 F.3d 994 (7th Cir. 2007) (Posner, J.). [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 3:09 pm
Garcia, the Supreme Court of Colorado dealt with a similar statute. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
Garcia-Quintanilla, 574 F.3d 295, 300-01 (5th Cir. 2009); Gov’t of the V.I. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Emily Garcia Uhrig previews Wood v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:14 am
Keeping with today's "light reading is good reading" theory, here's another opinion in which everything after the first couple of sentences is merely support for what you already know.Though this one has a twist. [read post]
