Search for: "US v. Lewis" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 3:30 pm
It's clear from the document that Customer #9 was a repeat customer and that he intended to use them again in the future. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
” But as Ben Barros has shown, it was actually deliberately inserted in the Midkiff opinion (O’Connor refused to take it out even after Justice Lewis Powell warned her that it would license virtually unconstrained takings).That said, Stevens is wrong to suggest that the Court’s only options were either to overrule Midkiff and Berman v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although there is no question that a trial court "necessarily has broad discretion to control and restrict the scope of the voir dire examination" (People v Boulware, 29 NY2d 135, 140, rearg denied 29 NY2d 670, cert denied 405 US 995; see People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199), we conclude under the circumstances of this case that the court erred in failing to permit defense counsel to conduct further questioning of the prospective juror to determine whether she could… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
The lodestar calculation is used to award attorney’s fees and is based on reasonable hours worked and a reasonable hourly rate. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by CMS
The R&S Pilling decision follows previous High Court authority Lewis v Tindale (2018) which held that a driver was uninsured for injury caused while driving the vehicle off-road. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved On 9 March 2022 HHJ Lewis heard an application in the case of Suleman v Badejo. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:21 am by Susan Brenner
Only individuals with a password, provided by the school district, could use the school e-mail system. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:08 am by Giles Peaker
They are both registered blind, use non-verbal communication, are incontinent, fed by tube and use wheelchairs. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:20 am by David Oscar Markus
Thomas Law Review have put together a symposium next weekend (November 12-13, 2010) entitled Bush v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
In a case highly dependent on its very unusual facts, the Court of Appeal in Griffiths v Tickle ([2021] EWCA Civ 1882) confirmed (in dismissing an appeal) that a mother and father involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings can be identified. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]