Search for: "United States v. Jones"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 3,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:10 am
In contrast, the Eighth Circuit has rejected the duplicative aggravating factor theory when applied to the FDPA, see Purkey, 428 F.3d at 762, and the Fifth Circuit has withdrawn its support of the double-counting theory in light of Jones, see United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:15 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri agreed. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, issued an opinion discussing whether cure awarded in a Jones Act claim should include the amount medical providers charged or the amount they accepted as full payment from a plaintiff’s insurer. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
(As amended in 2006, the Lanham Act requires that a mark be "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
Since the landmark case of Jones v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The recent case of Canada (United States of America) v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
Opponents of cell phone tower" tracking data relied on the 2012 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
Opponents of cell phone tower" tracking data relied on the 2012 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:11 pm
CAAF today issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will interpret a federal statute that imposes additional criminal penalties on repeat offenders. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
Jones, 44 F.3d 860, 871 (10th Cir. 1995); United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908)(striking down ban on "yellow-dog" contracts that forbade workers from joining trade unions.)Muller v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
