Search for: "United States v. Baker" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   It did not do so, for example, in its most recent ruling in a major gay rights case — the 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm by Alex Potcovaru
United States on the basis of the political question doctrine actually violates the requirements of the Torture Victim Prevention Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells promised that while he could not personally attend a two-day pre-trial hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
 The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just been reportedly faced with a case of alleged nepotism on the part of one of its Commissioners, the outcome being reported by the Washington Times (here, with a katpat to Chris Torrero for the link). [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
The United States of America argues, as an intervenor, that the PLCAA is constitutional. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm by Gabe Johnson-Karp
  This trend has included some pulling back from the near-per-se invalidation of discriminatory state laws under the Dormant Commerce Clause, most recently in United Haulers Ass’n v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am by Elina Saxena
” He then explained how standing issues complicate the United States’ potential to accommodate European demands for judicial redress for data collection. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am by Amy Howe
” At Notice and Comment, David Rubinstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram discuss United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
  Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Following growing frustration on the part of the United States and allies concerned with Russia’s seemingly exclusive targeting of non-ISIS enemies of Bashar al Assad’s regime in Syria, Russian airstrikes have finally targeted Islamic State controlled areas. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am by Elina Saxena
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]