Search for: "United States v. Brown"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 4,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
I use the recent United States Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 8:37 am
Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944), and Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
Supreme Court and for the victory in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:17 pm
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:13 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:42 am
Fletcher Michigan State University College of Law Abstract: In Michigan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:46 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
From 1861 to 1865, the United States fought a civil war. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:51 am
The Corps’ Definition of Waters of the United States From Clark Morrison: Justice Scalia’s passing may have an immediate impact on the Army Corps of Engineers’ expanded definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:51 am
The Corps’ Definition of Waters of the United States From Clark Morrison: Justice Scalia’s passing may have an immediate impact on the Army Corps of Engineers’ expanded definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am
United States — and when and how to apply the tests the Supreme Court ordered her to administer. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
This clause states, in part, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am
”[8] To discuss how this decision may affect your business operations, please contact Anupreet Amole of our London office or your usual Brown Rudnick adviser. ___________ [1] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2 (https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2018-0215-judgment.pdf) [2] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:55 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
