Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 5,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 12:34 am
This question has polarized the criminal bar and bedeviled the academic community since the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:38 pm
In the shadow of NCAA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:22 pm
United States this morning. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
Dressler v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
"Source: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florida-v-harris/Tampa Drug Defense Attorney has received an interesting comment on Drug Sniffing Dogs from one of our anonymous sources.I post the anonymous comment it in its entirety:"The dog lovers at the United States Supreme Court have once more dissed the dog haters at the Florida Supreme Court (I'm a cat person myself). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
A Federal Magistrate in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut has determined that Connecticut’s Gen. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
Other courtsin the United States, in deciding similar issues, have basically stated that equity (unjust enrichment) may provide hope for some compensation to the party whose cells have been utilized by researchers. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
Other courtsin the United States, in deciding similar issues, have basically stated that equity (unjust enrichment) may provide hope for some compensation to the party whose cells have been utilized by researchers. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:18 am
V is for Virtual Currency. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court has recognized only limited circumstances in which the usual rule does not apply. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:23 am
" Beddall v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 6:29 am
Current court challenges to the constitutionality of state DBE programs reflect this: Geyer Signal v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:40 am
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, 2011 WL 381625 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:47 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 29, 2011. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
Morales-Vázquez, No. 19-1503, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (January 19, 2021), Judge Bruce M. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm
It does not apply under all situtations and the United States Supreme Court has "recognized only limited circumstances in which the usual rule does not apply. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
The Court has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law,legal disputes submitted to it by States; and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questionsreferred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and agencies of the system. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
