Search for: "United States v. Ginsburg" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court ordinarily rejects criminal cases for review absent a material split of opinions in the state appellate courts, federal appellate courts, or both, unless the Court finds a compelling Constitutional question to justify review nonetheless. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:47 pm by adminssean
The United States Supreme Court extended the right to confront witnesses to the laboratory technicians who examine and test physical evidence that is offered to prove guilt. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:34 am
United States and other recent cases counsel against suppression when police act in “good faith. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States’ Argument Ed Kneedler argued for the United States here, and the argument was a delight for law professors like me. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Board of Trade, 06-1265), on the power of states to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds (Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:03 pm by Brian Wolfman
The following excerpt summarizes Stone's findings: [T]the eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am by Rory Little
United States), that the Justices were simply tired from the first argument, in Yates v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:45 am by Josh Douglas
 In particular, in both Washington State Grange, a challenge to a candidate's ballot designation of preferred political party on a ballot, and Crawford v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:02 am
As long as the United States in its current form, under our Constitution, persists, it's never too late to confirm a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:41 am by Wells Bennett
United States - or, gauging by the questions at oral argument, really only Judge Douglas Ginsburg – was interested in whether the defendant’s release from custody had mooted his appeal. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm by Sam Eichner
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]