Search for: "United States v. San Francisco" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,670
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
At the Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog, Julia Angwin reports on recent comments by the FBI General Counsel, who told the audience at a San Francisco conference that the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:12 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  They filed as Domestic Partners with the City and County of San Francisco in 1995 and with the State of California in 2003. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle suggests that, although the Court was not prepared to consider the question of same-sex marriage in 2003, when it decided Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:51 pm by admin
I predict, as I have for several years, that states currently banning same-sex marriage will change course when they are required to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages performed in other states, via Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, also known as the Full Faith and Credit Clause. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
In my San Francisco IP and business law practice I frequently talk with manufacturers, distributors, restaurants, retailers and other service businesses who want to protect trademarks, service marks and logo designs. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:22 pm
She became the face of the largest gender discrimination class action suit in United States history, Dukes v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:03 am by Marissa Miller
Today’s clippings include further commentary on the Court’s decision in the GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court decision regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:27 am by Walter Haines, Esq.
The NLRB did not apply the United States' Supreme Court's holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]