Search for: "Washington v. Roberts"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 4,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 5:47 am
Apple v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
” Commentary on Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
Robert Barnes at the Washington Post notes that Salazar is the Court’s first opportunity to weigh in on the Establishment Clause under the leadership of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:13 am
Not since Barnette v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Robert Barnes of the Washington Post notes that the cases “come before a court that traditionally has been sympathetic to business interests, but is sensitive about recent criticism from the left” regarding perceived corporate favoritism. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on a recent study indicating that Chief Justice John Roberts “plays favorites among his eight colleagues when assigning the court’s most important decisions. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports that the Court “appeared closely divided,” but he too notes that “[e]ven some justices who seemed sympathetic to the plaintiffs expressed qualms about how to administer [the] lawsuit” – an assessment echoed by Robert Barnes of the Washington Post. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 4:18 am
She argues that the three cases — Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am
Times previews Holder v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am
Rory Little has our preview of Dietz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes explores the possibility that President Obama would feel compelled to nominate a Protestant to the Court if Justice John Paul Stevens were to retire, leaving the Court with six Catholic and two Jewish Justices. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Buono, Black v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he … deeply divided order … still provides a guide for lower courts balancing government rules intended to preserve public health with parishioners’ constitutional religious rights. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
"For Clarence Thomas, avowed critic of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
Nelson profiles activist George Lane, whose landmark disability-rights case, Tennessee v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:32 am
For instance, in Pilgrim v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:02 pm
Robert A. [read post]
