Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 6,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2012, 4:23 am
If the New York City police department is a festering cesspool of racism, why is it that African American police officers (of which there are many) don't stand up and say something? [read post]
2 May 2010, 5:43 pm
I know it seems so logical, but we don't always do this. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 10:49 am
We don't have a floor speech saying clearly what the clause meant. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:12 am
If you don't show up for a lawsuit, the debt collector wins by default -- and it's rare to get another chance to defend yourself. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:03 pm
The ministry officials don't even pretend to be concerned with economic policy, job creation and sustainment, innovation, consumer choice. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
No I don't want to interact with this person, no to that person - Jim Carey's "no" personality before he got to "Yes. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
We don't bounce complaints on the pleadings simply because a judge thinks that the damage allegations of the plaintiff are perhaps overstated or come from an alternative source.Then there's the fourth basis for dismissal: that the "facts alleged elsewhere in the SAC undermine the existence of any such practice. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
And trial prep-don't forget that. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
It’s a straightforward term meaning in this case that the defendant has a heavy burden to overturn the judge’s decision to issue a search warrant. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
If only the legislature can create rules, whereas only the courts can apply them, then we have a ready distinction--but we don't need the new-rule/new-application distinction then; we can simply rely on the institutional distinction.Where there is no institutional difference, any distinction between a new rule and a new application of an old rule will be stipulative. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 9:15 pm
" We've read tons of Kozinski coverage (so you don't have to). [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
Nevertheless, the law doesn't see things that way, and even works that are less of 'artistic merit' can, and should be protected under various IP rights, since those rights don't discern based on the artistic value of something. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
Nevertheless, the law doesn't see things that way, and even works that are less of 'artistic merit' can, and should be protected under various IP rights, since those rights don't discern based on the artistic value of something. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:55 pm
And its understandable that judges in Ohio (and much of the rest of the country, I imagine*) simply don't believe that's how it works.So we have to educate them. [read post]
25 May 2007, 12:08 am
Me, I don't watch the TV lawyer shows. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:11 am
Class attorneys don't want to force the case into an unworkable trial, either, because they risk decertification if the judge wakes up. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:48 am
The judges donned their very authentic robes—with Cindy even wearing a wig(!) [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 2:08 pm
The Internet has globalized our communities in an unprecedented way, but if we don't safeguard the individual liberties of users, we risk sacrificing our freedom of thought and expression. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
If you're going to do this work in Texas, the Indigent Defense Commission keeps excellent, county-and-lawyer-level data on defense-attorney caseloads for comparison.Data gaps: There are more parts of a prosecutors' job about which we don't have data than those we do. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
I don't see an increase in abuse of process claims lying head based on preservation letters being sent. [read post]
