Search for: "Young v. State of California" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm by CJLF Staff
District Judge Cormac Carney concluded in the case of Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm by Brad Pauley
Southern California Gas Co., S188956 —Review Granted and Held—January 26, 2011 The issue presented is whether it was reasonably foreseeable that a car would drive off the road and strike a gas meter assembly over 11 feet from the curb, making a gas company liable for the death of a young woman who died in the accident. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 447 So.2d 1301, 1303 (Ala. 1984).California: Carlin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
  See, for example, a Drug and Device Law Blog favorite case, Rosen v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Young Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-15124 Case filed: December 6, 2012 <b>Initial Decision:</b> <a href=”#”>Month DD, YYYY</a><br> Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 29, 2015 11/30/2015 2/28/2016 2015-120 SEC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
So long as responsible, law-abiding adults may purchase handguns in California, the First Amendment prevents the State from enforcing Section 26820’s ban on on-site handgun advertising. [1] See Bigelow v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:09 am
LiberalsStrong Support for California Anti-Gay Measure Proves That Many Blue-State Voters Embrace Red Agendas [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:07 pm
And: Four years ago, the Supreme Court faced a similar situation in Roper v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:32 am by Ben
In a lawsuit filed on 22 January 2018 in California District Court SMASH 137 argues that his mural was used in the advertisements without his knowledge or consent (Adrian Falkner v General Motors, Case 2:18-cv-00549-SVW-JPR). [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTTo be televised by ESPNGrand Valley State Lakers v. [read post]