Search for: "*du. S. v. Doe" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2009, 9:51 pm
The Kats' noses are still ahead of Le blog du droit européen des brevets (9%) and the effervescent Spicy IP (6.9%). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
” · CU’s speculation about what would happen if Churchill returned does not justify legal findings. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:56 am
  The claim du jour apparently is a lawyer’s failure to file a motion to suppress an identification; the issue was raised in both State v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
The Brieger class members are not excluded from this class, because claim splitting, defendant’s proposed reason for excluding these members, does not generally apply to class action suits. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Although the SEC’s complaint did not discuss Rule 10b5-2(b)(1), Cuban argued that the rule does not apply. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
Les articles 14 et 88 du règlement (CE) n °6/2002 ... doivent être interprétés en ce sens que le titulaire du droit aux dessins et modèles créés dans le cadre d'un rapport contractuel autre qu'un rapport de travail subordonné, tels que les… [read post]