Search for: "A & B Extreme, Inc" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm by Gene Quinn
All of those are bad facts no doubt, but inequitable conduct is a sliding scale test, although the en banc rehearing of Therasence, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
For example, in 2009, Pfizer Inc. reached a settlement with the federal government and states over allegations of health care fraud contained in nine qui tam cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
"He is extremely prepared, articulate and passionate," said Jones Day litigator Thomas R. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
GTE Sylvania, Inc., 447 U.S. 102, 108 (1980). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:26 am
  Here in New York, a public adjuster's fraud in deliberately exaggerating or inflating a claim may be imputed to the insured customer either for the purpose of recovering paid fraudulent claims (Chubb & Son, Inc. v. [read post]
Ryan for the proposition that in the context of a business transaction, an “extreme set of facts” — involving the complete and utter failure of the directors “to even attempt to meet their duties” — would be necessary to support a claim that disinterested directors were intentionally disregarding their duties. [13] Lyondell indicates that a breach of the good faith component of the duty of loyalty requires much more egregious conduct than that necessary… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
January 18, 2010 - January 1, 2010 To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
January 18, 2010 - January 1, 2010 To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 8:45 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Ryan, noting that ‘[i]n the transactional context, [an] extreme set of facts [is] required to sustain a disloyalty claim premised on the notion that disinterested directors were intentionally disregarding their duties. [read post]