Search for: "APPLICATION OF SHARP"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 4:51 pm
In addition, the Commission affirmed ALJ Rogers’ determination that Japanese Patent Application No. 61-185772 (the ‘772 application) does not anticipate the asserted claims of the ‘343 patent because (1) the “step part” in the ‘772 application is not “downstream of a contact point of the blade and the roller part” as required by the claims, and (2) no “lower edge” of the blade contacts the roller of the ‘772… [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
[42] This is in sharp contrast to the consideration of whether the COC is a "public authority". [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:09 am
And the electronic applications systems being used to triage resumes are not helping. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
See also the UK Human Rights Blog post, below.Knecht v Romania (App No 10048/10) (2 October 2012)The applicant had embryos stored at a fertility clinic in Romania. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:08 pm
We have held that absent a credible reason for withholding the information, "[i]ntent may be inferred where a patent applicant knew, or should have known, that withheld information would be material to the PTO's consideration of the patent application. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
” The plaintiffs clearly allege that the defendants failed to regulate content provided by third parties such as Sharp and Rodriguez when they were using the defendants’ service. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 12:30 pm
On receiving an application to operate a strip club, Rocky Mount, N.C.'s police chief must review "the entire body of municipal, state, federal, and common law" within 15 days so as to determine whether the applicant is in compliance. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:07 am
How sharp is your fairness lens? [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Perhaps, instead of a vertical application of the Constitution, we should push for a horizontal one, in which the state action requirement is eliminated, and rights are enforceable between private citizens. [read post]
31 May 2021, 11:00 pm
All pending cases will be withdrawn now, which most significantly entails that the European Court of Justice (the upper division of the Court of Justice of the EU) won't address the Dusseldorf Regional Court's questions regarding the application of EU antitrust law to component-level licensing and SEP injunctions in case no. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
More bad news from Eponia“We have a patent application which has been sitting untouched on an examiner’s desk in the EPO for over 10 years”, writes a friend to Merpel. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
Immunotherapy patent survives pessimistic mindsetMerck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
19 May 2017, 8:00 am
Sharpe (1954) a decade later. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
The move is also in sharp contrast to Apple’s uncooperative behavior in the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
They claim that the '053 Patent is invalid in light of an earlier patent application (WO 99/59042, known as "Peless"). [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:50 pm
(LCB) Aaaaaahh Flora Sapio, you make excellent points to blunt the sharpness of my suggestion of the monstrosity of compassion outside of the triadic relationship between thing, sign and interpretant. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
Day 2 and 3 of the hearing brought premature reports that the the Board of Appeal would be referring questions on priority to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA), with Day 4 ultimately bringing the conclusion that Broad Institute's appeal would be dismissed, due to their patent being found to lack priority.SpecialKat Chijioke Okorie examined the decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and 2 Others… [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:00 am
Yet, as explained in the enlightening and invariably engaging Patry on Fair Use, it is unlikely that the Court intended such a sharp distinction and that, instead, Justice Souter was just making a small, illustrative point. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
