Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
New York. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:15 pm
" In early news coverage, Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports that "Court Refuses to Reinstate Travel Ban, Dealing Trump Another Legal Loss. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:25 am
’” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak offers a step-by-step report on the process leading up to Gorsuch’s nomination, noting that “Mr. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
As the New York Times put it yesterday, “the Brotherhood used violence for decades in pursuit of its Islamist goals, but officially renounced it in the 1970s and embraced democracy as its means. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 4:16 am
” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on the light Gorsuch’s writings on euthanasia and assisted suicide might shed on the nominee’s views on abortion, noting that Gorsuch “saw no necessary constitutional connection between a right to abortion and one to assisted suicide or euthanasia. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
An op-ed I wrote for the New York Times in December 2015, back when both a Trump presidency and the possibility of a Muslim ban seemed blissfully hypothetical, has mostly been cited for rehearsing the doctrinal edifice of plenary power. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
The first was issued by the Southern District of New York in Mission Capital Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
Analysis of the impact of the appointment on the court comes from Peter Baker in The New York Times and Richard Wolf in USA Today. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am
Schneiderman, a First Amendment challenge to a New York law that allows merchants to give discounts to customers who pay in cash, but prohibits the imposition of surcharges for customers who use credit cards, and Life Technologies v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
The New York Times reports that, outside of Washington, Silicon Valley was especially vocal in its reaction to the Executive Order. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am
” Additional coverage of the final stretch of the nomination process comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, Michael Shear and Adam Liptak at The New York Times, and Nina Totenberg at NPR. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
said in a statement attached to the order that there was still more work for lower courts to do in assessing the law, and that Texas could return to the high court once that review is final”; Adam Liptak in The New York Times; and Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily, who observes that the court’s move “cleared the way for the new Trump Administration to switch the government’s position – if it wishes to do so – to… [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:58 am
"Justices Appear Willing to Protect Offensive Trademarks": Adam Liptak has this article in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
As the Editors write-- "Three and a half months after the extract's appearance in France, the Federalist editor of the New York Minerva, Noah Webster, obtained a copy of the French newspaper from Epaphras Jones, a New York City merchant and ship owner who had recently returned from France. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 9:21 am
” * Fusion: What happens when your tweet goes viral * I was asked to contribute to the New York Times’ Room for Debate. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am
” Betsy McCaughey also weighs in on the case in an op-ed in the New York Post, asserting that New York’s anti-surcharge law is “a huge favor to the credit-card industry — and it comes at the expense of all consumers. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm
"Justices Face 'Blizzard of Words' in Special Education Case": Adam Liptak of The new York Times has this report. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
Schneiderman, a First Amendment challenge to a New York law that allows merchants to give discounts to customers who pay in cash, but prohibits the imposition of surcharges for customers who use credit cards. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:44 am
In Adams v. 724 Franklin Ave. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:20 am
The Supreme Court is hearing argument today in the case of Nelson v. [read post]
