Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 3,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2018, 6:03 pm
Superior Court) which interpreted a different fees provision that exists outside the scope of the Act. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:48 am
Here in Florida, the concept of vicarious liability has been well-established since the 1920 Florida Supreme Court case of Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Such a split among lower courts is generally seen as a powerful reason for the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
Superior Court, 3 Cal.5th 531, 545 (2017). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
The Court’s June 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
He brought the case on behalf of himself and as a representative action pursuant to the California Private Attorney General Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
He brought the case on behalf of himself and as a representative action pursuant to the California Private Attorney General Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
Additional Resources: Whitburn v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
that under 42 USC § 1983 and state law.The Court of Claims granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim No. 126268 as against the State and the Attorney General's Office, and Claim No. 126067 as against the State and the Attorney General's Office. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 7:49 am
In Gulutz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.5th ___ (Feb. 8, 2018). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.5th ___ (Feb. 8, 2018). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:10 pm
Superior Court, 3 Cal.5th 531 (2017), a case decided after the district court had issued its order (memorandum available here). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1067, 1079; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 8:23 am
Even though this was a federal case, had it been filed in a Massachusetts state court such as the Suffolk Superior Court in Boston or our federal court, the court would use local state law so there would be no defense of assumption of risk as it has been abolished. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
In fact, in Kelo v. [read post]
