Search for: "BARNETT v. STATE"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 9:14 am
Under West Virginia State Board of Educ v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:50 pm
For example, I could explain why I think that the majority view in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 1:54 pm
Barnett v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
Barnett at Gun-Rights Showdown, who writes:"Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Heller v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
Within the hour, oral arguments will kick off at the Supreme Court in Heller v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have played prominent roles in the development of the "New Originalism. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:48 pm
Barnett is apparently willing to bite the bullet and say, well, if that's what the original public meaning was, we're stuck with it, until the Article V amendment process runs its course. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 2:35 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
"Justice Curtis, offered the following interpretation in his dissent in Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 4:58 pm
So, while there may have been a strong originalist case in Coker, there is scant historical evidence to support a finding for the State in Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:10 am
Instead of protecting the collective rights of the people in the states, Barnett maintains that Ninth Amendment protects only individual rights and cites as critical support the opposition views of the antifederalist Virginia Senate and the majority opinion in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Barry Barnett of Blawgletter has an interesting post on some of the practical ramifications of the case. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 2:46 am
(Randy Barnett is an exception, as are many of the folks at Cato.)Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
Barnett and Barnett LLC Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
See id. at 702; Barnett, 579 N.E.2d at 86. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:30 pm
Hyde, brought the case in Texas state court. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
See, e.g., Hartline v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Stated otherwise, if the plaintiff-client cannot prove that it would have prevailed in the underlying action, the defendant-attorney's negligence was not a proximate cause of any damages arising from the loss of the same. [read post]
