Search for: "Barrett v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
Moreover, the oral argument last December strongly indicated that five Justices—Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—were inclined to overrule Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm by MOTP
HOUSE BELOW GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY; MID-STATE… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:18 am by Gabriel Chin
The Supreme Court heard argument on Monday by telephone in Pham v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:30 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States is more satisfying than the majority on several counts. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:06 am by Madelaine Lane
Barrett, Case No. 141407, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ judgment and remanded the matter to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Ligons v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere weigh in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]