Search for: "Boring v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 6:48 am by Laura C. Nagi
Aug. 26, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit reaffirmed its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:51 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
 This year the competition focuses on National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Tostitos and SunChips products bore an “All Natural” label: The Fritos Bean Dip products bore an “All Natural” label: Plaintiffs brought warranty, intentional misrepresentation, and consumer protection claims under the laws of multiple states. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by Jeff Redding
  I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:16 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:04 am by Susan Brenner
He also noted that Henderson bore the burden of proof on this issue. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:35 am
At risk of being boring, this Kat feels that the facts display another of the growing number of litigated disputes in which a little more forethought at an earlier stage, and a subsequent willingness to sit down and negotiate a settlement, might have saved everyone a good deal of money and anguish. [read post]