Search for: "Brown v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 8,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 12:03 pm
He worked at the State Department as well as Paul, Weiss and he assisted Thurgood Marshall in preparing both briefs and oral argument in Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Brown, No. 03-0168 (2d Cir. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
See Sample v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:31 am
I previously reported on the Stafford County case of Suzanne Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 11:10 am
The central argument is that litigation has been a poor and sometimes perverse vehicle for securing social change, that such cases as Brown v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 7:35 am
See State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:23 pm
In its Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:20 pm
In an unpublished decision, Cevallos v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
6 May 2016, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
Brown, S189476, for Tuesday, September 6, at 10 a.m. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:53 pm
In an expansive recent ruling, the California Court of Appeal in Brown v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:49 pm
Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thus, this article argues that Sweatt set the stage for Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:59 pm
Brown that the state of California had no reason to strip from lesbians and gay men the right to wed. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:31 am
In his post-trial opinion issued last week in Grove v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
In State v. [read post]
